Crowd-sourced Equity Funding Bill: A gift to a few, a lump of coal to others
read
Start-ups and small businesses around Australia have been waiting with baited breath for the Federal Government to release the draft legislation for crowd-sourced equity funding. On Thursday 3 December they got their wish. While the draft legislation is largely in line with the Government’s previously announced policy, and in our view will still open up another avenue for funding for start-ups and small businesses in Australia, there are many who believe the Federal Government delivered a lump of coal rather than the regulatory framework on their Christmas wish lists.
The Corporations Amendment (Crowd-sourced Funding) 2015 Bill (Bill) has now been introduced into Federal Parliament. The Bill and accompanying explanatory memorandum details how crowd-sourced equity funding (CSF) will be regulated in Australia. Here we discuss the new Bill.
The Bill sets out the following key eligibility criteria for use of CSF within Australia:
The Bill further outlines the process that is to be followed to undertake a CSF offer. This process includes:
The Bill contains provisions with respect to defective CSF Offer Documents that align with existing provisions in Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The provisions include both civil and criminal liability where there is a statement, omission or new circumstance, which leads to the document being defective, which is materially adverse from the point of view of the investor. The existence of a defective Offer Document will enliven various obligations imposed upon the intermediary and may subject the intermediary to liability as well as other entities or persons responsible for the Offer Document.
The Bill imposes a number of obligations upon CSF intermediaries who seek to offer a platform on which CSF can occur. These obligations include ‘gatekeeper’ obligations requiring suspension or closure of offers in response to various circumstances including defective offer statements. Further, any intermediary must:
There are a number of investor protections built into the proposed CSF regime, including the investor cap detailed above. Further, investor protections include:
One of the critical differences between a public company and a private company is the additional ongoing compliance obligations that apply to public companies. The Bill recognises this and provides corporate governance concessions for a company that registers or converts to a public company after the commencement of the CSF regime and indicates upon its application for registration that the company intends to make a CSF offer after registration. The company must then complete a CSF offer within 12 months of registration. The relevant concessions include:
Eligible companies may utilise the annual general meeting and online financial report concessions for as long as it satisfies the eligibility criteria for corporate governance concessions. An eligible company may only utilise the audit concession for the lesser of five years from the date of registration as, or conversion to, a public company or when the company has raised more than $1 million from CSF offers or other offers requiring disclosure at any time.
If you would like to discuss how crowd-sourced equity funding could benefit you and your company either as an issuer or an intermediary, contact HopgoodGanim Lawyers’ Corporate Advisory and Governance team.